« Maxwell Moments--August 1st, 2004 | Main | Movie Rating System Revisited »

News and Notes--August 4

My site just passed the 10,000 hit mark--thanks to all. I'd be interested in seeing the 'unique vistor' total (since a large number of those 10,000 visitors are me) but Typepad doesn't keep track of them...

Some other interesting/noteworthy links for this week:

First, leeches and now medicinal maggots! Let's hear it for ALL of God's creations!

IntellecXhibitonist discusses the new angle in the latest court case for legalized polygamy. I stand by my statement that polygamy won't be coming back to the Church any time soon, no matter what the law allows...but this court case should be interesting.

Best and worst commercials discussed here
My favorite commercial (which no one seems to remember) is the Lee Jeans 'Wanna borrow some soap?' one from the late 80's. Even funnier was that it had nothing whatsoever to do with jeans. Honorable mentions: Bud Light's "Paper vs. Plastic" one from a few years ago, and an obscure one where it parodied other product commercials by having a cartoon sun pop out of the front of a cereal box and start talking to a mom and her kids...and they immediately start screaming and running away like it was a monster in a horror movie. (I can't even remember what product the commercial was actually for...)

Okay...why did this take three years?

The controversy that won't end: Like Orson Scott Card before him, Dr. Robert Millet of BYU is continually defending his decision to see "The Passion". My former stake president, Dr. Millet is still one of my favorite people...although I'd still like him to explain why "The Passion..." is okay to see despite the heavy violence while any other movie rated R for heavy violence would not be...

August 4, 2004 in Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/988150

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference News and Notes--August 4:

Comments

Baron:

The cartoon sun commercial is one of my favorites ever. But like you I can't remember the product being pitched -- guess it wasn't that effective of a commercial even if it was hilarious.

Posted by: William Morris | Aug 4, 2004 1:16:58 PM

Re: Yates - I imagine he was hoping that she'd recover sooner from her mental issues. I admire him for sticking around as long as he did to be a support. Talk about magnanimous.

>okay to see despite the heavy violence while any other movie rated R for heavy violence would not be...

I'm sure you know the answer to that. Circumstances are relevent. The reasoning is relevent. Freddy Krueger doesn't serve a higher purpose. What Jesus endured does.

Posted by: Renee | Aug 4, 2004 3:51:30 PM

That's just it, though...I don't see WHY the circumstances are relevant. Seeing an actress nude playing Eve in a 'Garden of Eden' production (or in a 'Bathsheba takes a bath' scene in a David biopic) versus seeing the SAME actress be nude in some romantic comedy seems to me to be about the same: Different circumstances, but same content. Why would it suddenly become 'appropriate' if the film has a spiritual context, when it's 'inappropriate' at all other times? Why wouldn't ANY violent movie with a spiritual or moral lesson be 'appropriate' then? I still don't get it...

Posted by: The Baron | Aug 4, 2004 5:26:41 PM

I would like to know the difference of black breasts and white breasts. Such as in "Quigley Down Under" (pg)and pretty much any "National Geographic" film where women of Aboriginal or African Tribes are shown doing their daily routines without any rating increase. This is because they are "natives, and they are doing what is natural for their people". If I were to make a documentary film on the "White" women or women who are "civilized" who join nudist colonies, or who are breast feeding - you can bet it would recieve an "R" rating or the breast would be fuzzed out like it was under federal witness protection. Ask any 5th grader - they know what a black breast looks like... but a white one is some how more special, more erotic? It's a double standard.

Posted by: yellow duck | Aug 5, 2004 8:21:14 AM

FWIW, my blog passed the 20,000 hits mark a few days ago. It doesn't count visits from my home or work computer and it has only been keeping stats since 05 May 2004. The unique visitors count is at 11,874, of which 10,417 are first-time visitors.

Posted by: Kim Siever | Aug 5, 2004 9:38:25 AM

Post a comment