« Today's controversial topic of discussion... | Main | October 2004 General Conference Thoughts: Day Two »
October 2004 General Conference Report: Day One
Some random thoughts and comments from Saturday's session of LDS General Conference:
1. As expected, quite a few tributes to departed Elders Maxwell and Haight. Also, not surprisingly, a greater emphasis on the position of apostle and Church organization in talk topics. Considering it's been almost ten years since the Church has had to call a new apostle (just think...all this time Elder Eyring has had to be known as the "New Guy") and at least three million members hadn't even joined the Church yet the last time it happened, it was probably time for a refresher course.
2. Elder Perry refered the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles as a 'fraternity'. The use of the word is probably appropriate given the context--however the modern connotation of 'fraternity' nowadays can lead one to create some interesting (and irreverent) mental pictures of things that go on in their quorum meetings. I wonder what the 'hazing' ritual is for new apostles... :)
3. Sister Parkin, showing no disappointment from not being called to the apostleship, testified of the power of Relief Society not just for women, but for everyone. This is one thing I would like to see more from the (male) apostles...more emphasis on Relief Society and the good it gives to everyone. I can't remember the last time, anyone not in the Relief Society general presidency talked just about Relief Society (hmmm...maybe I'll look that up...)
4. Everytime I hear Elder Groberg speak, it makes me like the movie "The Other Side of Heaven" less (if that's possible...). Elder Groberg almost always shares experiences from his time as a missionary and/or mission president in Tonga whenever he speaks, but today he shared two specific experiences that were both captured in the movie. Doesn't anyone but me see the difference? Elder Groberg (the speaker) shared the experience, but then immediately shared the point (or lesson) of the experience: namely, the shaping of his testimony of the love of God. All you who continually give "OSH" the movie praise and awards, clip out Elder Groberg's talk from Saturday, watch those two scenes again on your cherished DVD and explain how the movie demonstrates Elder Groberg's lesson from those two experiences in movie form (Hint: it doesn't...) Once again, Elder Groberg provides more content in one sentence relating to his mission experience ("Things are how they are...and complaining doesn't help") than the entire movie could in two hours. And yet, Church members still see fit to make it the highest grossing LDS movie to date... Grrr--I'd better stop before a blow a blood vessel in my head...
5. Elder Stabeli (sp?) made multiple references to living in 'the mission field'. I'm assuming he means 'outside of Utah'--not 'as a mission president'? That's been the meaning of the phrase in common, casual usage around Utah, but I hadn't heard a General Authority use it that way before...
6. Subtle comment from Elder Eyring about the 'bloodsport' of personal criticism used in political elections (like--coincidently--our current presidential one). Remember in the old days of US history, where the loser of the election became the vice president? Glad we got rid of that--can you imagine the chaos if both Bush and Kerry had to coexist together in the same White House? Can you imagine the chaos if the Church held popular elections for new prophets or apostles? Do you think in that case, potential Church leaders could hold off from 'attacking' their opponents to gain popular support? I doubt it...
7. Film critic Roger Ebert has a saying: "It's not what a movie is about that matters, but how it is about it." A new romantic comedy or action movie might be a four-star movie, while another one might be one star or less--even though from a plot standpoint they might be exactly the same. The way you present a message can make a difference in whether it's good or bad, even if the message itself is the same. For example, Elder Scott talked about repentance on Saturday (like he almost always does) but his talk also demonstrates this principle that "it's not what a conference talk is about that matters, but how it is about it" The "repentance" talk is something that we've heard many, many times before (often from Elder Scott himself) but his presenting it in the 'peace of mind/peace of conscious' context gives the subject a new way of looking at it. There are no new ideas in the gospel, of course--the same messages have been given for centuries, and will continue to be in the future--but Elder Scott's talk shows how old, familiar topics can seem new and fresh by how you phrase it...
October 3, 2004 in LDS Church News | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1194117
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference October 2004 General Conference Report: Day One:
Comments
4. I agree. Elder Groberg's recollection of the event when they are stranded on the beach offered so much more insight into what was going through his mind. The movie, on the other hand, only showed the survivors dying of thirst and hunger.
5. That would be Staheli. :) As a missionary who served in Utah, the usage of the phrase "the mission field" to refer to anything outside of Utah really broke my heart. It implied that our mission somehow was less than all others.
Posted by: Kim Siever | Oct 3, 2004 1:27:07 PM
Yeah, 'the mission field' phrase sort of shocked me last night. I've always thought of it as a Utahan provincial expresssion and hearing a General Authority use it was disappointing.
This whole female Apostle issue is very disturbing to me. Am I mistaken in thinking that the Apostleship is a Melchizedek Priesthood office? I think this is a slippery slope here and we should all tread carefully.
Posted by: Sparky | Oct 3, 2004 2:40:45 PM
Being someone who was converted and currently lives "in the mission field," I was neither insulted nor shocked by the phrase. I was able to decipher his meaning after a couple of references, and took to heart the idea that life as a Saint away from Utah is indeed very different and difficult in its own way. I don't think anything more was implied by the expression than that.
Before you get too "shocked" or "heart-broken" about something like that, you should give yourself a swift kick in the pants. While you were thinking bad thoughts, there was a good talk going on.
Oh, and can we get an amen (or at least a 'selah') on that whole women and the Priesthood thing? To those who seem fixated on this: Do you realize that it would take you less effort to just go and find another church to accommodate your every whimsical desire? If this IS the True Church, then accept God's organization and desist in murmuring.
Posted by: Joe | Oct 3, 2004 5:49:08 PM
I often wonder at the whole 'mission field' thing myself. Sure, I live in Australia, but there are 2 Stake Centers within 5-10 minutes drive time of my house, and the temple is about 15 minutes drive away. What gives?
Posted by: dp | Oct 3, 2004 11:40:39 PM
Yes, Apostle is a Melchizedek Priesthood office.
Posted by: Kim Siever | Oct 4, 2004 10:02:06 AM