« The World of Religion... | Main | The Infallibility (Double) Standard »
World of Religion--Footnote
(footnote from yesterday...see here for context)
In my BYU World Religions class, we watched a short video about Jainism, an ancient religion similar to Hinduism. Jain monks practice the principle of ahimsa (non-violence) devoutly, to the extent of carrying a broom to sweep the ground before them when they walk, so they don’t accidentally step on a small insect or worm. Jain monks devote themselves completely to their religion, spending their time traveling from village to village spreading the word of God.
- They love God and their fellow man completely.
- They keep their covenants faithfully
What do they lack?
- A personal testimony of Jesus Christ and His Atonement
- Essential ordinances performed by someone with the proper authority.
Now, compare that to me who has completed the second list, but not the first. Not to minimize the importance of faith in Christ nor of the vitality of priesthood ordinances, but which set of requirements is easier to complete? Is it easier to develop true love and charity towards your fellow man and always keep your covenants, or to learn about the role of Jesus Christ and complete the required ordinances? You could sit down with one such Jain monk and complete what he ‘lacks’ in an hour or two, including baptism. With the first list, not so easy… So, who really is closer to the celestial kingdom?
June 8, 2005 in Religion | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2610386
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference World of Religion--Footnote:
Comments
A footnote to the footnote:
One interesting tidbit about Jain monks is that, as part of their non-violence philosophy, they not only do not eat animals, they don't eat PLANTS either...
"Well, what in the world do they eat, then?" you ask. As it was explained to us, they only eat LEFTOVERS from the people they visit. That way they are not PERSONALLY responsibile for the death of any animal or plant, since they only eat what was originally prepared for other people, nothing more.
There's a logical fallacy in there somewhere, I suppose, but I still thought it was clever...
Posted by: The Baron | Jun 8, 2005 11:52:30 AM